Pankaja
08-23-04, 10:37 AM
I have poured through quite a bit ( I know I have not exhausted all ) about C# and VB.Net. Personally, I would like to move on with C#, which somehow feels a bit more elite and get a little far from the ridicule that people often feel when you say that you develop using Visual Basic.
Structure-wise it is so similar in the .Net world, since everything is OO and one derives in the same manner from the Superclass. Also, most of the support in terms of say, for example, generating XML documents from source code comments, unsigned types, operator overloading, to name a few are going to be available in VB.Net with Whidbey. So, as far I can understand there should be no difference at all between the two languages, pretty soon.
I would like to hear from anyone out there that could explain, if there is something very compelling to claim one is better than the other.
Structure-wise it is so similar in the .Net world, since everything is OO and one derives in the same manner from the Superclass. Also, most of the support in terms of say, for example, generating XML documents from source code comments, unsigned types, operator overloading, to name a few are going to be available in VB.Net with Whidbey. So, as far I can understand there should be no difference at all between the two languages, pretty soon.
I would like to hear from anyone out there that could explain, if there is something very compelling to claim one is better than the other.